This year, Nvidia had another great event at CES, in which President Jensen Huang's Main address. There were many amazing things in Huang's main address, but one thing really caught my attention and it was NemoAn offer that helps AIS on board for company use. I was fascinated by the fact that the elements that Huang described about Nemo are various digital libraries that train AIS, how to interact with others, understand culture and understand language limitations and understanding, all of which ensure that the new AI can smoothly integrate with the company implementing it.
It is ironic that HR rarely does so, especially in relation to distant human employees. As a result, thanks to Nemo, companies will do a much better work in the field of AI implementation than probably with real people. I do not suggest avoiding Nemo because of this, but maybe take the elements in Nemo and AI and use it to better on board new employees, especially remote employees.
Let's talk about it this week, because we are increasingly using progress to help AI better work than people and do not do enough to use technology to improve the integration of human employees, which, I think, I think, lead to the fact that employees will not be able to compete with their AI counterparts.
People versus AI
In the seventies, when I performed bachelor's work for my second degree, which focused on working power management, my career path was disturbed when it was discovered that the use of science to choose employees to employ and promotion was discriminating. The reason for this was that most minorities are refused education needed for competitiveness, so they were in an adverse situation in tests. Instead of solving the problem of education, the US government has launched EEOC (remuneration committee of employment opportunities). This effort tried to force diversity without correcting the basic educational problem and forbidden the working force management because it seemed discriminatory.
It is fascinating to me that AI has (yet) there is no problem of discrimination; We have offers such as NEMO, which use technology to integrate AIS with the companies they will operate. The approach to the choice of artificial intelligence focuses only on its possibilities. There may be some discrimination based on a company that has created artificial intelligence depending on where this company lives, or perception of the brand's brand, but because these things are not people, we do not feel the need to overcome this kind of discrimination, so we choose artificial intelligence and provide it with training without caring for discrimination.
This is what we should do with employees: choose them based on their capabilities, and then make sure that they are fully able to integrate with the people they will work with. Nvidia talked about physical artificial intelligence and tools such as cosmos that train robots to better interact with other robots and surrounding people. This may cause robots to have much better training and much better integration efforts than people.
The robots already have huge potential advantages of their human counterparts, because they can usually work longer, harder and in areas that would hurt or potentially kill people. They are stronger, they never get sick and can be easier to fix than people.
Summary: We need Nemo and Cosmos for people
I don't discredit what Nvidia is doing. I suggest that we accept the same training concepts and adapt them to training and on board human employees. There is no doubt that ultimately AIS and robotics will replace most of the jobs that are currently performed by people, but this trend can be much easier to master and spread for a long time, if we also work on improving the tools we use for training, choose and on board people of employees. There is no reason to favor AI and robots, so of course over people. Technology can be used to improve both. The future in which AI, robots and people are optimally employed would be a better world than what we have now or what we probably end up if people become outdated prematurely.
Like what should be done in the seventies to ensure that everyone had the same training capabilities, regardless of the minority status, we must work to make sure that people do not become a new minority not impaired, using similar teachings to training people we use in artificial intelligence. If we do not do it, we are observing ourselves prematurely.
So, while I applaud what Nvidia did with Nemo and CosmosWe also need to make similar efforts to better ensure that people can remain competitive with AI and robotic counterparts (like this for doctors) and spread the transition so that we have time to find out what roles should play in our artificial intelligence and a robotic future.
